Improving Critical Thinking Through Effective Argumentation

FULL TEXT:

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between critical thinking and the argumentative function of language. Tracing the origins of critical thinking back to Socratic questioning, the authors define it as a reasoned process of evaluating information. They emphasize the importance of argumentation as the highest form of language function, to illustrate the progression from expressive to descriptive and finally to argumentative language. The article further analyzes the conditions for successful communication, including clarity of expression, truthfulness, normative correctness, and sincerity, and delves into the concept of "proposition" within speech acts and discourse.

About the Authors

List of references

Budden, R. (2007). Critical Thinking. Pearson Education.

Gusarenko, S.V. (2015). [Insert Full Title Here - Likely related to Discourse and Propositions].

Habermas, J. (2001). The Theory of Communicative Action. Beacon Press.

Masduqi, H. (2011). Developing Students' Critical Thinking Skills Through Learning. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 185-199.

Paducheva, E.V. (2004). Dynamic Models in Discourse Semantics.

Buribayeva Aziza. (2022). Formation of basic oral speech skills in English (on the example of 8-9 classes of secondary school). Conference Zone, 172–173. Retrieved from http://conferencezone.org/index.php/cz/article/view/485

Bo‘ribayeva Aziza Ismatillayeva - Modern requirements for teaching a foreign language at a2 level. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECSE) Vol 14, Issue 02 2022.

How to Cite

Buribaeva, A. (2025). Improving Critical Thinking Through Effective Argumentation. MMIT Proceedings, 97–98. Retrieved from https://mmit.tiue.uz/index.php/journal/article/view/218
Views: 0