2026: MMIT'26 Xalqaro Konferensiyasi maqolalar to'plami
983-992
2026-06-06
Ochiq kirish

XALQARO JINOYAT SUDI YURISDIKSIYASI VA RAQAMLI DALILLAR: ZAMONAVIY MUAMMOLAR VA RIVOJLANISH ISTIQBOLLARI

O’rolov Abdulla
https://doi.org/10.61587/

Qabul qilingan: 2026-05-20

Nashr etilgan: 2026-06-06

PDF
Crossmark Crossmark

Annotatsiya

Ushbu ilmiy maqola zamonaviy texnologik transformatsiyalar davrida Xalqaro jinoiy sud (XJS) yurisdiksiyasi hamda raqamli dalillardan foydalanishning huquqiy mexanizmlarini chuqur tadqiq etadi. Tadqiqotda Rim statuti doirasida ochiq axborot resurslari (OSINT), koinotdan olingan tasvirlar, kriptografik aloqalar, biometrik ma’lumotlar va metaverse muhitidagi elektron izlarning huquqiy maqomi tahlil qilingan. Shuningdek, maqolada sun’iy intellekt tomonidan yaratilgan soxta kontentlar (deepfake) va kvant texnologiyalari kabi yangi avlod tahdidlari sharoitida protsessual ishonchlilikni saqlash masalalari ko‘rib chiqiladi. Al-Werfalli kabi xalqaro pretsedentlar misolida dalillarning autentifikatsiyasi va daxlsizligi muammolari o‘rganilgan. Tadqiqot yakunida XJS faoliyatini raqamlashtirish, maxsus tahliliy tuzilmalar yaratish va post-kvant himoya tizimlarini joriy etishga oid qonunchilik takliflari shakllantirilgan.

Adabiyotlar ro'yxati

  1. Rim statuti (1998). Xalqaro Jinoyat Sudi Nizomi, A/CONF.183/9.

  2. Berkeley Protocol on Digital Open Source Investigations (2018). BMT Inson huquqlari bo‘yicha Oliy komissari boshqarmasi & UC Berkeley.

  3. Croci, L. (2025). The International Criminal Court and Digital Evidence. i-lex, 18(1), 1-17.

  4. McDermott, Y., Hausknecht, A. & Liefgreen, A. (2026). ICC judges’ perspectives on user-generated evidence. Oñati Socio-Legal Series.

  5. Liulina, A. (2025). Evidentiary Digital Platforms: Al Mahdi and Al Hassan Cases. International Criminal Law Review, 25(5), 840-868.

  6. Nilaei Sangari, Z. & Mohammadi, A. (2026). International Criminal Court and Digital Evidence. Journal of Criminal Law Research.

  7. Gavrysh, K. (2025). Digital Evidence in the Practice of the ICC: Ukraine Proceedings.

  8. ICC Office of the Prosecutor. (2024). Harmony Project Overview.

  9. Lexology. (2026). The wrong type of legal spectacles: authenticity in litigation.

  10. Bellingcat. (2023). Guide to Open Source Verification in Conflict Zones.

  11. Human Rights Center, UC Berkeley. (2019). Digital Fingerprints: Using Open Source Data to Document Human Rights Abuses.

  12. Yevropa sudining shaxsiy ma’lumotlar himoyasi bo‘yicha ishlari: Big Brother Watch v. UK (2021), Szabó va Vissy v. Hungary (2016).

  13. OTP, ICC. (2022). Policy on the Crime of Aggression.

  14. Syrian Archive. (2020). Digital Evidence in International Criminal Proceedings: Challenges and Best Practices.

  15. Khan, K. (2024). Statement of the Prosecutor to the Assembly of States Parties.

Mualliflar haqida

O’rolov Abdulla
uralov0106@gmail.com
Termez State University

Litsenziya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Qanday iqtibos keltirish kerak

XALQARO JINOYAT SUDI YURISDIKSIYASI VA RAQAMLI DALILLAR: ZAMONAVIY MUAMMOLAR VA RIVOJLANISH ISTIQBOLLARI. (2026). MMIT Proceedings, 983-992. https://doi.org/10.61587/