Comparative analysis of assessment methods in the history of pedagogy

FULL TEXT:

Abstract

The article discusses the main methods of assessing students' knowledge, used in different
historical periods of the development of pedagogical science. A comparative analysis of traditional and
modern approaches to assessment has been carried out, their strengths and weaknesses have been identified.
The key changes in approaches to assessing academic achievements from oral exams to a competencybased approach are presented. Special attention is paid to the influence of the socio-cultural context on the
choice of assessment strategies

About the Authors

List of references

Выготский Л.С. Психология развития человека. — М.: Смыл, 2005.

Бим-Бад Б.М. Педагогический энциклопедический словарь. — М.: Большая Российская энциклопедия, 2002.

Кубасов С.А. История педагогики: от античности до современности. — М.: Академия, 2018.

Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. Tinkering Toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform. — Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. Assessment and Classroom Learning // Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. — 1998. — Vol. 5(1). — P. 7–74.

Платон. Диалоги / Пер. с древнегреческого. — М.: Мысль, 1993.

Kreeft, P. Socratic Logic: A Logic Text using Socratic Method, Platonic Questions, and Aristotelian Principles. — South Bend: St. Augustine's Press, 2004.

Marrou, H.-I. A History of Education in Antiquity. — Madison: University of Wisconsin

Press, 1956.

Leff, G. Paris and Oxford Universities in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries: An Institutional and Intellectual History. — New York: Wiley, 1968.

Халиков А.Х. История образования и педагогической мысли. — Казань: Казанский университет, 2010.

Кравцов С.Н. История образования в Европе: от традиций к модерну. — М.: Просвещение, 2009.

Roach, J. Public Examinations in England 1850–1900. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.

Tröhler, D. The Languages of Education: Protestant Legacies, National Identities, and Global Aspirations. — New York: Routledge, 2011.

Овчинникова Т. Ф. Педагогика и общество XIX века: социокультурные основы образовательных реформ. — СПб.: Алетейя, 2017.

Thorndike, E. L. Educational Psychology. — New York: Columbia University, 1921.

Terman, L. M. The Measurement of Intelligence. — Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1916.

Алексюк А. М. Педагогика высшей школы: история, теория, практика. — Киев: Лыбидь, 1998.

Madaus, G. F. The Influence of Testing on the Curriculum. In: Tanner, L. N. (Ed.) Critical Issues in Curriculum. — Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989. — pp. 83–121.

Shepard, L. A. The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture // Educational Researcher. — 2000. — Vol. 29(7). — pp. 4–14.

Селевко Г. К. Современные образовательные технологии. — М.: Народное образование, 1998. — 256 с.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment // Phi Delta Kappan. — 1998. — Vol. 80(2). — pp. 139–148.

Хуторской А. В. Ключевые компетенции как компонент личностно ориентированной парадигмы образования // Народное образование. — 2003. — № 2. — С. 58–64.

Redecker, C. The Future of Learning: Preparing for Change. — Luxembourg: European Commission, 2013.

Shepard, L. A. Formative Assessment: Caveats and Promises. In: Dylan Wiliam (Ed.) Assessment and Learning. — London: SAGE, 2006. — pp. 29–43.

Бекбаев Р. Р. Теории познания. — Ташкент, 2023.

How to Cite

Ubaydullayeva, U. (2025). Comparative analysis of assessment methods in the history of pedagogy. MMIT Proceedings, 278–282. https://doi.org/10.61587/mmit.tiue.uz.v1i1.208
Views: 1