ALGORITHMS FOR CALCULATING ESTIMATES BASED ON MINIMIZING ERRORS IN OBJECT CLASSIFICATION

Received: 2025-05-20

Published: 2026-10-01

Abstract

In this study, the distribution of real objects and synthetically augmented classes was analyzed,
and their impact on machine learning models was evaluated. The training outcomes of logistic regression, decision trees, random forest, and SVM models using synthetic data were compared with those trained on real object datasets. Experimental results demonstrated that the use of synthetically augmented data improves the classification model's accuracy, with particularly significant enhancements observed in the
performance of certain algorithms.

List of references

  1. He, H., & Garcia, E. A. (2009). "Learning from Imbalanced Data". IEEE Transactions on

  2. Knowledge and Data Engineering.

  3. Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). "SMOTE:

  4. Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique". Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research.

  5. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S.,

  6. Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). "Generative Adversarial Nets". Advances in Neural

  7. Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).

  8. Fernández, A., García, S., Herrera, F., & Chawla, N. V. (2018). "SMOTE for Learning

  9. from Imbalanced Data: Progress and Challenges". Journal of Artificial Intelligence Review.

  10. Liu, B., Ding, H., & Wang, Y. (2020). "Synthetic Data Augmentation for Medical

  11. Diagnosis". IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

  12. J. Smith, “Medical Classification Systems,” Journal of AI in Medicine, 2020.

  13. R. Brown, “Heuristic Algorithms in Diagnosis,” Medical Informatics Review, 2019.

  14. Nishanov, A., Ruzibaev, O., Tran, N. (2016). Modification of decision rules 'ball Apolonia'

  15. the problem of classification. 2016 International Conference on Information Science and

  16. Communications Technologies (ICISCT). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISCT.2016.7777382

  17. Nishanov, A., Saidrasulov, Sh., Babadjanov, E. (2022). Analysis of Methodology of Rating

  18. Evaluation of Digital Economy and E-Government Development in Uzbekistan. International

  19. Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 14(2), 2447–2452. https://doi.org/10.9756/INT-

  20. JECSE/V14I2.230

  21. Nishanov, A., Ruzibaev, O., Chedjou, J. C., Kyamakya, K., Abhiram, K., De Silva,

  22. Djurayev, G., Khasanova, M. (2020). Algorithm for the selection of informative symptoms in the

  23. classification of medical data. Developments of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in

  24. Computation and Robotics, 12, 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811223334_0078

  25. Nishanov AKh, Turakulov AKh, Turakhanov KhV. Reshaiushchee pravilo dlia

  26. klassifikatsii patologii zritel'noĭ sistemy [A decisive rule in classifying diseases of the visual

  27. system]. Med Tekh. 1999 Jul-Aug;(4):16-8. Russian. PMID: 10464756.

  28. Nishanov, A., Akbarova, M., Tursunov, A., Ollamberganov, F., & Rashidova, D. (2024).

  29. Clustering algorithm based on object similarity. Journal of Mathematics, Mechanics and Computer

  30. Science / Computer Science, 123(3), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.26577/JMMCS2024-v123-i3-4.

About the Authors

Sherali Xaydarov
Mamajanov Rakhmatilla

License

How to Cite

ALGORITHMS FOR CALCULATING ESTIMATES BASED ON MINIMIZING ERRORS IN OBJECT CLASSIFICATION. (2026). MMIT Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.61587/

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)